Dewey vs Raindrop

Dewey and Raindrop are both bookmark managers but they target different territory. Dewey is narrow and deep on social-media bookmarks (X, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Threads, TikTok, Reddit, Mastodon, Substack). Raindrop is broad and polished across every kind of web content you'd want to save.

Short answer

Dewey wins if your reading life is mostly social posts and threads. Raindrop wins if you save articles, videos, PDFs, and files alongside any social content. Keep is the option if you want both and also need markdown output for AI agents.

Dewey

Save and search X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, TikTok, Threads, Reddit, and Mastodon bookmarks in one place.

Free, paid from $10/mo

  • One of the only tools that syncs X bookmarks natively
  • Supports LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, TikTok, Reddit, Mastodon, Substack bookmarks too
  • AI auto-tagging for fast organization of thousands of saves

Raindrop

All-in-one bookmark manager with collections, tags, and a polished UI across every platform.

Free, paid from $3/mo

  • Best-in-class UI for organising a large library of saves
  • Nested collections and tags for serious curators
  • Native apps on every major platform including browsers

Feature comparison

Dewey has a feature set tailored to social platforms. Raindrop has a bigger surface but doesn't sync X bookmarks natively. Here's where each wins and where Keep slots in.

FeatureDeweyRaindrop
Capture and save
Browser extension
Mobile apps
Save from email
Save tweets
Save YouTube videos
Save GitHub stars
Save PDFs
Save files (docs, spreadsheets)
Save audio files
Save via API
Auto-sync sources
RSS auto-sync
YouTube channel sync
X bookmarks sync
GitHub stars sync
Newsletter inbox sync
Library and reading
Reader view
Offline reading
Full-text search
Semantic / AI search
Highlights
Notes
Tags
Collections
Public sharing
Full-text RSS extraction
AI and agents
Markdown export for AI agents
Bulk markdown export
MCP server
CLI tool
Claude Code skill
AI summaries
Public API
Import and export
OPML import / export
Pocket import
Instapaper import
CSV / JSON export
Send to Kindle

Pricing

Dewey: Free (manual sync), Pro $10/mo or $7.50/mo annually, Lifetime $225, Export Pass $50 for 48h. Raindrop: Free (unlimited), Pro $3/mo ($28/yr). Keep: Free (50 items), Pro $10/mo, Max $25/mo.

Dewey

  • Free

    Manual sync, one connected account, search, filters, folders, tags, AI assistant.

    Free
  • Pro

    $10/mo monthly or $7.50/mo annual. Automatic sync, unlimited accounts, public folders, Notion + Google Sheets sync.

    $10/mo
  • Lifetime

    $225 one-time. Matches Pro features.

    Custom
  • Export Pass

    $50 for 48-hour export access without a Pro subscription.

    Custom

Raindrop

  • Free

    Unlimited bookmarks, collections, tags, sync devices. 100 MB/month uploads.

    Free
  • Pro

    Full-text search, permanent web archive, 10 GB/month uploads, Stella AI assistant, annotations on highlights.

    $3/mo

Strengths and weaknesses

Dewey's strength is narrow focus done well. Raindrop's is breadth and polish. Different tools for different jobs.

What Dewey does well

  • One of the only tools that syncs X bookmarks natively
  • Supports LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, TikTok, Reddit, Mastodon, Substack bookmarks too
  • AI auto-tagging for fast organization of thousands of saves
  • Custom RSS feed of your bookmarks for external workflows

Where it falls short

  • Social-bookmark focus only (no articles, PDFs, or reader view)
  • No native mobile apps or public API
  • Exporting your library requires Pro or a $50 Export Pass
  • No MCP server or AI-agent-ready markdown export

What Raindrop does well

  • Best-in-class UI for organising a large library of saves
  • Nested collections and tags for serious curators
  • Native apps on every major platform including browsers
  • Genuinely usable free tier with unlimited saves
  • Official MCP server for Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and more

Where it falls short

  • Not a reading app; reader view is secondary
  • Export formats limited to HTML, CSV, and TXT (no markdown or JSON)
  • No native RSS subscription or newsletter intake
  • Highlights are basic compared to Readwise Reader or Matter

Which one should you pick?

Pick Dewey if…

Your X bookmarks are the main thing you care about, and you want a dedicated UI with AI auto-tagging, social-specific filtering, and RSS output for external workflows. You don't need native mobile apps or a public API.

Pick Raindrop if…

You save a wide mix of web content and want the most polished bookmark manager available. Raindrop's nested collections, tags, reader view, permanent web archive, and MCP server cover broader use cases.

About Dewey

Dewey is a niche tool aimed at one specific problem: saving and organising bookmarks from social platforms. It ingests from X, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Threads, TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, Mastodon, Substack, and Truth Social, and puts them in a unified library with AI auto-tagging and nested folders. Browser extension (Chrome) and web app only, no native mobile. Pricing: Free (manual sync, one account), Pro at $10/mo monthly or $7.50/mo annually, Lifetime at $225, and an $8.50 one-off 'Export Pass' that unlocks the export feature for 48 hours without a full subscription.

About Raindrop

Raindrop is a bookmark manager with polished apps on every major platform, a generous free tier with unlimited bookmarks, and a surprisingly thorough AI layer for Pro users. Pro is $3/mo ($28/yr) and unlocks full-text search across saved pages and PDFs, the Stella AI assistant, a permanent web archive, reminders, and annotations on highlights. Highlights themselves are free on every tier. The product quietly got ambitious on AI in 2025. There's an official MCP server at /rest/v2/ai/mcp that works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code with Copilot, Windsurf, and Zed, plus an open REST API with OAuth and token auth.

Frequently asked questions

Which tools actually sync X bookmarks?

Dewey and Keep. No other mainstream tools in this comparison sync X bookmarks natively. Most treat social posts as ad-hoc saves via the browser extension rather than as a synced source.

Does Raindrop work with X or Bluesky?

You can save individual posts via the browser extension or mobile share sheet, but Raindrop doesn't automatically sync your bookmarks from those platforms. Dewey and Keep do.

Can I use both Dewey and Raindrop?

Sure. They don't overlap much. Use Dewey for social bookmarks and Raindrop for everything else. Keep replaces both if you want one tool with markdown output for agents.

Which is cheaper?

Raindrop Pro at $3/month is much cheaper than Dewey Pro at $10/month monthly or $7.50/month annually. Raindrop's free tier is also far more generous than Dewey's (Raindrop is unlimited; Dewey's free tier requires manual sync and a single account).

Does Dewey have mobile apps?

No. Dewey is web and Chrome extension only. Raindrop has native iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and Linux apps plus extensions for every major browser.

Can I export my library from either?

Raindrop exports as HTML, CSV, or TXT on all tiers. Dewey exports require Pro or a one-time $50 Export Pass for 48 hours. If exportability matters, Raindrop wins.

Does either support reader view?

Raindrop has a built-in reader view for articles. Dewey doesn't. It's a bookmark manager for social posts, not a reading app. For long-form reading, use Matter, Readwise Reader, or Instapaper.

What about LinkedIn, Bluesky, or Threads bookmarks?

Dewey syncs from all of those, plus TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, Mastodon, and Substack. Raindrop doesn't. If your bookmarks live across multiple social networks, Dewey is built for that.

Does either have an AI layer?

Both. Raindrop Pro has the Stella assistant (semantic search, summaries) and an official MCP server. Dewey has AI auto-tagging for bulk organisation. Raindrop's AI is more general-purpose.

Which is better for a large library?

Raindrop, easily. Nested collections, unlimited tags, filters, and polished apps across every platform. Dewey works well for social bookmarks but doesn't scale to the same workflows for mixed content.

Keep exploring